![]() ![]() Hard to envision someone worse than Quisling but I haven't really checked Norway and don't now its political history enough so that could be possible. ![]() The main question for me would be whether Norway already has a NatPop and if so by whom its led. The goal isn't to massively change Red Russia but to provide an alternative to players who aren't satisfied with the current focus tree for Socialist Russia. And given it's Quisling we're talking about. Kaiserreich: The Second October Revolution is a submod for the Russian Socialist Republic that changes and adds more to the socialist nation. But, as stated, that only works if there is a definitely worse option. It's possible to make an argument that Quisling belongs to the latter. That's extremly large in terms of possibilities: it can simply be a traditionnal monarchy or a dictatorship where one person simply holds way too much power, but it can also cover regimes that are close to Totalitarianism but lack certain key features. Otherwise, we have to remember that Paternal Autocrat is technically a kind of "catch-all" term for all authoritarian regimes that have little to no trace of democracy but also don't cross the border into being fully totalitarian. If there are none, then yeah Quisling should definitely be moved to National Populist because what I see about him seems more coherent for a NatPop than a PatAut. ![]() Click to expand.The main question for me would be whether Norway already has a NatPop and if so by whom its led. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |